Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Conceptual scheme: Language and objects (ontology) are assumed as conceptual scheme by some authors. - In contrast, the content is formed by stimulus influences. In particular, between W.V.O. Quine and D. Davidson the status of the conceptual scheme is disputed. See also reference system, language, meaning._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Michael Esfeld on Conceptual Schemes - Dictionary of Arguments
I 146 ~ Third Dogma/scheme/content/Davidson: instead of the third dogma we assume a direct relationship to the world, then there is no limit to understanding - no foreign conceptual schemes prevent us from having access to the beliefs of others. >Two Dogmas, >Beliefs, >Other minds, >Content, >World/Thinking._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Es I M. Esfeld Holismus Frankfurt/M 2002 |
||
> Counter arguments against Esfeld
> Counter arguments in relation to Conceptual Schemes
